Point and counterpoint in the Institutional Evaluation: documents analysis of the establishment of SINAES.

Authors

  • José Carlos Rothen Centro Universitário do Triângulo - Unitri

Keywords:

Avaliação Institucional, Avaliação da Educação Superior, Regulação e controle da Educação Superior, Universidade, Educação Superior

Abstract

Taking as presupposition that the history of the institutions evaluation follows two directions, that are emancipation/formation and regulation/control, this work has as investigation object the documents produced in the scope of the Ministry of Education that established SINAES, in order to identify their evaluation conceptions. In a first moment in order to contextualize the debate, we present a brief historical reconstitution of the processes of institutional evaluation. For that, the two evaluation types mentioned above will be used as leading elements. Secondly, the documents on the evaluation which are produced by the National Commission of Evaluation of the Higher Education (CONAES)/INEP are analyzed, as well as the proposal of MEC of ordinance that links the evaluation and the regulation. It is concluded that the impasse of Lula’s government in defining the function of the evaluation, makes it difficult to establish SINAES. The delay in the definition of what and how to evaluate might suggest that the government does not get to accomplish a complete cycle of the institutional evaluation.

Author Biography

José Carlos Rothen, Centro Universitário do Triângulo - Unitri

rof. Dr. do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Superior do Centro Universitário do Triângulo - Unitri

Downloads

Published

2007-09-27

How to Cite

ROTHEN, J. C. Point and counterpoint in the Institutional Evaluation: documents analysis of the establishment of SINAES. Educação: Teoria e Prática, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 27, p. 119, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.periodicos.rc.biblioteca.unesp.br/index.php/educacao/article/view/699. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 27 (2006)

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

a) Authors assign copyright to the journal, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and publication in this journal.

b) The policy adopted by the Editorial Committee is to assign copyright only after a period of 30 months from the date of publication of the article. After this time, authors interested in publishing the same text in another work must send a letter to the Editorial Committee requesting the release of the assignment of copyright and wait for a response.

c) This journal provides public access to all its content, since this allows greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of research, by distributing OJS as well as other software to support the public access publication system to academic sources. The names and email addresses on this website will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and will not be available for other purposes. This journal provides open any other party Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License