Validity of the RAST for evaluating evaluating anaerobic power performance as compared to Wingate test in cycling athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5016/6983Keywords:
Cyclists. Mountain bike. Running-based anaerobic sprint test. Running test.Abstract
The validity of the Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) was investigated to evaluate the anaerobic power performance in Wingate test in athletes cycling. Ten mountain-bike male cyclists (28.0±7.3 years) randomly performed Wingate Test and RAST with two trials each. After several anthropometric measurements, peak power (PP), mean power (MP) and fatigue index (FI) for RAST and Wingate Test were compared by Student´s paired t-test, Pearson’s linear correlation test (r) and Bland and Altman’s plot. Results showed that, with the exception of FI (33.8±4.6% vs. 37.8±7.9%; r=0.172), significant differences were detected between the Wingate and RAST tests with regard to PP and MP. Although there was a strong correlation for PP and MP, or rather, 0.831 and 0.714 respectively, agreement of analysis between Wingate and RAST protocols was low. The above suggested that RAST was not appropriate to evaluate the performance of anaerobic power by Wingate test in the sample under analysis.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) The authors assign copyright to the magazine, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared with recognition of its authorship and publication in this magazine.
b) The policy adopted by the Editorial Committee is to assign copyright only after a period of 30 months from the date of publication of the article. After this time, authors interested in publishing the same text in another work must send a letter to the Editorial Committee requesting permission to transfer copyright and await a response.
c) This magazine provides public access to all its content, as this allows greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information about this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the public access publishing system for academic sources. The names and email addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the magazine and will not be available for other purposes. This journal provides open any other party This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License